How slow-motion video can sway jurors' decisions

A bar chart plotting study participants’ ratings of how much time a person in a crime-scene video had to assess the situation before firing. On a scale of zero, meaning almost no time at all, to one hundred, meaning quite a lot of time, people who viewed the video at regular speed gave it a fifty-five, while those who viewed it in slow motion gave it a sixty-nine. A second bar chart shows the results of a simulation in which thirty-nine out of one thousand juries unanimously said the person shot with intent to kill when the video was viewed at regular speed, while one hundred fifty juries did so when it was viewed in slow motion.

  • In courtrooms, juries are sometimes shown crime-scene videos to help assess the case. But video may not be a reliable indicator of a suspect’s intentions, according to Chicago Booth’s Eugene M. Caruso and his co-researchers. When footage is shown in slow motion, people are more likely to infer that a suspect’s actions were intentional.
  • Participants imagined themselves as jurors and watched a video of a robbery that ended in a shooting. Some saw the footage at regular speed, but those who watched the slow-motion version were more likely to feel the perpetrator had more time, had acted willfully and deliberately, and had the intention to kill.
  • Even when participants were told how much time had elapsed, they still sensed more intent when the video was shown in slow motion.

Click here to download this briefing as a PDF.

More from Chicago Booth Review

More from Chicago Booth

Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.