On Friday, the US Department of Labor reported that the United States added 228,000 new jobs in November, marking 86 consecutive months in which the country has added jobs. The US unemployment rate stands at 4.1 percent, the lowest it’s been since it dipped just below 4 percent in 2000. Over the past year, the numbers of “marginally attached” workers (who want to work and have looked for a job within the last year, but not within four weeks of being surveyed) and “discouraged” workers (who have stopped looking for work because they don’t think jobs are available) have both diminished significantly. So has the US reached the point of “maximum sustainable employment” (MSE), one of the mandates given to the Federal Reserve?

The consensus among economists is muddy. Days before the Labor Department released its November jobs data, Chicago Booth’s Initiative on Global Markets reported the results of a poll of its Economic Experts Panel, in which 22 percent of respondents said the US economy is still operating below MSE, 12 percent said it isn’t, and 55 percent were either uncertain or had no opinion.

“Unemployment is down, which is great,” wrote MIT’s David Autor, “but labor force participation still has a lot of headroom to rise.”

The panelists’ disparate opinions may stem in part from the definition, or lack thereof, of MSE itself. The IGM also asked its panelists whether the concept of MSE “is well defined enough to be used beneficially in economic policymaking,” and only 40 percent of the panel said that it was.

Caroline Hoxby, Stanford
“As a labor and microeconomist, I find ‘maximum sustainable employment’ to be only loosely grounded in economic reasoning.”
Response: Disagree

José Scheinkman, Princeton
“‘Enough’ is the operative word.”
Response: Agree

Richard Thaler, Chicago Booth
“The concept is clear enough, but who knows how to measure it?”
Response: Uncertain

Kenneth Judd, Stanford
“The last time we had [a] sustained unemployment rate below 4 percent was ’66-’69, the peak of the Vietnam War.”
Response: Disagree

Steve Kaplan, Chicago Booth
“Labor force participation, particularly for men, could be higher.”
Response: Agree

Larry Samuelson, Yale
“We might aspire to a higher labor force participation rate, but there is little evidence we can push the unemployment rates markedly lower.”
Response: Disagree

More from Chicago Booth Review

More from Chicago Booth

Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.